| Top
Security News |
OverPhishing
Continues To Grow
Phishing websites grew by leaps and bounds according to a new report by the Anti-Phishing Working Group...
McAfee
Rattles Photoshop
Adobe, makers of wonderful software, including Photoshop, posted a bulletin regarding the image software...
More
Mac Viral Love: Inqtana
F-Secure picked up on two more variants of the Inqtana worms. While the worms
are extremely limited in their lifespan, they do show hackers...
Chinese
Hack Into Lineage
South Korean network security firm GEOT blamed Chinese hackers for a massive hit, raiding private information from tens of thousands of people involved in the popular South Korean mmorpg known as "Lineage...
Teen
Bloggers Offer Too Much Information
A new study of teen bloggers, aged 13 to 17, turned a lot of new and useful information
about teen bloggers. Unfortunately, some of that information wasn't so good...
Apple’s
Words of Wisdom
It seems Apple has sent a warning to hackers. As the first viruses for the vaunted
inherently more secure Mac OS X, Apple left messages sprinkled throughout their
operating system...
New
Mare Kicks At Linux
Much attention is going to other viral issues on other operating systems right
now. That doesn't mean operating systems like Linux don't feel the love because
it does...
Olympic
Gold Medalist And Spyware Distributor
Australian skier and Olympic Gold Medalist Dale Begg-Smith also looks to be a
first-rate spyware distributor. he site StopScum.com put together the information
discussing Begg-Smith...
Microsoft
Weekly Security Release
Microsoft released their monthly security patch on Tuesday and it included seven
security bulletins. The bulletins varied and cover a number of different problems... |
|
|
|
|
Two weeks ago, Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) proposed legislation designed to protect
consumer data by forcing various companies to destroy the consumer information
after a reasonable period of time. The big question is will it work?
Markey, the ranking Democrat on the Telecommunications and Internet Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee introduced the legislation amid a slew of well-publicized data breaches among various financial institutions. When the bill was introduced, Markey made a statement,
"In this digital information age, personal identifiers are the keys which unlock the personal lives and valuable possessions of millions of Americans. Internet companies are often able to glean personal information through a computer user's surfing and searching of Internet sites. Such entities should not hoard these personal identifiers in databases that often hold the imprints of millions of individuals and their Internet use.
"This warehoused personal information about consumers' Internet use should not be needlessly stored to await compromise by data thieves or fraudsters, or disclosure through judicial fishing expeditions." said Rep. Markey, who is also the author of H.R. 1078, "The Social Security Number Protection Act," a bill aimed at protecting consumers from the abuse of the purchase and sale of social security numbers.
The standard in the bill is based on similar successful legislation requiring cable companies to destroy obsolete data. The Federal Trade Commission will set up the rules to regulate this new law. The primary section of the bills says:
An owner of an Internet website shall destroy, within a reasonable period of time, any data containing personal information if the information is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was collected or any other legitimate business purpose, or there are no pending requests or orders for access to such information pursuant to a court order.
So far, the biggest problem with the bill many critics point out is that it's overly broad. Bruce Cundiff, research analyst for Javelin Strategy and Research, called the legislation very vague. He said, "Source of identity fraud from businesses is not as widespread as we're led to believe. 6% of known data fraud is stolen from financial institutions. This particular piece of legislation is addressing a small portion of the problem."
If this is the case, then how can identity theft be stopped? What can be done through legal channels to protect consumers from identity theft? Cundiff continues, "Let's make it more difficult for fraudsters to use the information. Social security numbers are a good example. Let's make the usage of that information less powerful."
He went on to say, "From a victim perspective, the source of the fraudster obtaining information, that represents a small piece of the overall pie. That's primarily the issue for the business. I don't know if the best course of action is legislative. It's getting consumers involved in the business of protecting themselves."
Some comments suggest companies like Google shouldn't hang on to all their information indefinitely and that this type of behavior was part of the problem. But this is an adjustment that has to be made.
As more and more information circulates through the Internet, data protection will continue to climb in importance. Companies certainly face tough issues by protecting consumer data but at the same time, consumers do have responsibility to protect themselves as well. This means being more careful not just online but also in how they use their personal information outside of the Internet.
About
the Author:
John Stith is a technology writer with SecurityProNews. |
|